Brice Turang is the highest-rated second baseman in MLB 2026 on Legends Deck, at 94 overall. The top three are Brice Turang, Otto Lopez, Ketel Marte, ranked by a percentile transform of real 2026 Statcast data. Every player here is a playable card.
Play a half-inning in our Statcast-driven sim. Brice Turang is rated 94 here because his real 2026 Statcast numbers rank at the top of every second baseman.
| # | Player | Team | OVR ▾ | AVG | OPS | HR | RBI | SB | Barrel% | Exit Velo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94 | 0.268 | 0.816 | 21 | 100 | 19 | 7.7% | 90.3 | View card › | ||
| 2 | 93 | 0.305 | 0.786 | 11 | 71 | 34 | 6.0% | 89.1 | View card › | ||
| 3 | 86 | 0.249 | 0.748 | 22 | 76 | 4 | 9.4% | 90.2 | View card › | ||
| 4 | 86 | 0.256 | 0.735 | 10 | 67 | 27 | 5.9% | 89.4 | View card › | ||
| 5 | 86 | 0.260 | 0.824 | 35 | 96 | 2 | 12.4% | 91.0 | View card › | ||
| 6 | 84 | 0.277 | 0.830 | 30 | 92 | 5 | 12.2% | 91.4 | View card › | ||
| 7 | 83 | 0.239 | 0.758 | 27 | 81 | 10 | 11.3% | 91.9 | View card › | ||
| 8 | 83 | 0.282 | 0.781 | 10 | 52 | 20 | 3.8% | 85.4 | View card › | ||
| 9 | 83 | 0.256 | 0.797 | 22 | 55 | 16 | 10.8% | 89.7 | View card › | ||
| 10 | 82 | 0.231 | 0.711 | 19 | 55 | 41 | 8.2% | 90.4 | View card › | ||
| 11 | 81 | 0.295 | 0.791 | 11 | 69 | 11 | 2.8% | 87.1 | View card › | ||
| 12 | 81 | 0.245 | 0.743 | 15 | 57 | 19 | 5.2% | 87.6 | View card › | ||
| 13 | 80 | 0.263 | 0.666 | 8 | 72 | 23 | 1.4% | 85.9 | View card › | ||
| 14 | 80 | 0.303 | 0.755 | 6 | 61 | 7 | 3.1% | 86.4 | View card › | ||
| 15 | 77 | 0.258 | 0.728 | 10 | 36 | 6 | 7.6% | 88.7 | View card › | ||
| 16 | 77 | 0.247 | 0.714 | 8 | 42 | 7 | 5.3% | 87.3 | View card › | ||
| 17 | 76 | 0.277 | 0.780 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 2.7% | 85.7 | View card › | ||
| 18 | 76 | 0.276 | 0.720 | 12 | 73 | 10 | 4.0% | 86.5 | View card › | ||
| 19 | 76 | 0.261 | 0.723 | 6 | 32 | 9 | 4.1% | 89.0 | View card › | ||
| 20 | 75 | 0.274 | 0.735 | 13 | 50 | 3 | 6.2% | 89.3 | View card › | ||
| 21 | 75 | 0.247 | 0.712 | 9 | 44 | 4 | 7.2% | 87.8 | View card › | ||
| 22 | 74 | 0.310 | 0.764 | 6 | 64 | 10 | 1.2% | 86.4 | View card › | ||
| 23 | 72 | 0.244 | 0.650 | 9 | 59 | 20 | 3.4% | 85.4 | View card › | ||
| 24 | 70 | 0.258 | 0.694 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 5.4% | 85.5 | View card › | ||
| 25 | 67 | 0.267 | 0.703 | 4 | 23 | 1 | 4.8% | 87.3 | View card › | ||
| 26 | 66 | 0.285 | 0.739 | 3 | 8 | 22 | 2.9% | 84.7 | View card › | ||
| 27 | 65 | 0.260 | 0.727 | 8 | 38 | 0 | 6.1% | 86.2 | View card › | ||
| 28 | 65 | 0.240 | 0.690 | 11 | 42 | 8 | 10.5% | 90.5 | View card › | ||
| 29 | 65 | 0.238 | 0.653 | 3 | 31 | 2 | 3.0% | 82.9 | View card › | ||
| 30 | 64 | 0.210 | 0.608 | 7 | 30 | 7 | 8.4% | 88.0 | View card › | ||
| 31 | 64 | 0.251 | 0.823 | 10 | 24 | 0 | 10.4% | 88.9 | View card › | ||
| 32 | 64 | 0.246 | 0.693 | 17 | 66 | 4 | 5.1% | 88.3 | View card › | ||
| 33 | 64 | 0.254 | 0.675 | 9 | 67 | 3 | 3.2% | 87.4 | View card › | ||
| 34 | 63 | 0.225 | 0.629 | 7 | 41 | 9 | 3.9% | 87.2 | View card › | ||
| 35 | 63 | 0.264 | 0.746 | 10 | 46 | 3 | 8.5% | 89.5 | View card › | ||
| 36 | 63 | 0.125 | 0.368 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% | 80.9 | View card › | ||
| 37 | 62 | 0.264 | 0.681 | 9 | 59 | 8 | 1.7% | 86.3 | View card › | ||
| 38 | 62 | 0.237 | 0.685 | 22 | 73 | 4 | 3.8% | 87.1 | View card › | ||
| 39 | 62 | 0.215 | 0.620 | 15 | 49 | 10 | 5.8% | 86.8 | View card › | ||
| 40 | 62 | 0.261 | 0.806 | 9 | 32 | 3 | 4.8% | 86.8 | View card › | ||
| 41 | 61 | 0.185 | 0.608 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 9.0% | 87.8 | View card › | ||
| 42 | 60 | 0.125 | 0.325 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 92.2 | View card › | ||
| 43 | 60 | 0.234 | 0.652 | 4 | 21 | 4 | 6.2% | 89.6 | View card › | ||
| 44 | 60 | 0.270 | 0.735 | 4 | 16 | 2 | 1.2% | 84.7 | View card › | ||
| 45 | 60 | 0.063 | 0.274 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 84.5 | View card › | ||
| 46 | 59 | 0.242 | 0.693 | 13 | 72 | 1 | 6.7% | 87.5 | View card › | ||
| 47 | 58 | 0.245 | 0.650 | 4 | 26 | 30 | 3.4% | 86.8 | View card › | ||
| 48 | 58 | 0.235 | 0.646 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 9.6% | 90.7 | View card › | ||
| 49 | 58 | 0.214 | 0.602 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8.7% | 90.7 | View card › | ||
| 50 | 57 | 0.167 | 0.623 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 5.7% | 85.7 | View card › | ||
| 51 | 56 | 0.079 | 0.235 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.1% | 88.2 | View card › | ||
| 52 | 56 | 0.229 | 0.537 | 2 | 13 | 18 | 3.5% | 88.5 | View card › | ||
| 53 | 55 | 0.229 | 0.640 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 6.4% | 87.0 | View card › | ||
| 54 | 55 | 0.212 | 0.563 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 5.0% | 88.1 | View card › | ||
| 55 | 54 | 0.243 | 0.651 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3.2% | 86.1 | View card › | ||
| 56 | 54 | 0.197 | 0.585 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5.3% | 88.0 | View card › | ||
| 57 | 52 | 0.247 | 0.727 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 5.6% | 86.9 | View card › | ||
| 58 | 51 | 0.259 | 0.651 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 3.4% | 85.8 | View card › | ||
| 59 | 50 | 0.217 | 0.562 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 4.0% | 84.1 | View card › | ||
| 60 | 50 | 0.217 | 0.612 | 10 | 45 | 2 | 8.0% | 89.2 | View card › | ||
| 61 | 48 | 0.277 | 0.844 | 4 | 16 | 0 | 6.9% | 83.2 | View card › | ||
| 62 | 45 | 0.250 | 0.500 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | View card › | ||
| 63 | 44 | 0.208 | 0.614 | 3 | 20 | 5 | 7.3% | 90.8 | View card › | ||
| 64 | 43 | 0.148 | 0.431 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4.0% | 86.0 | View card › | ||
| 65 | 43 | 0.195 | 0.490 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 5.6% | 88.7 | View card › | ||
| 66 | 43 | 0.000 | 0.167 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 85.1 | View card › | ||
| 67 | 43 | 0.000 | 0.200 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 91.3 | View card › | ||
| 68 | 43 | 0.187 | 0.528 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 9.3% | 88.4 | View card › | ||
| 69 | 42 | 0.240 | 0.664 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 2.1% | 85.6 | View card › | ||
| 70 | 42 | 0.153 | 0.461 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 1.2% | 86.3 | View card › | ||
| 71 | 40 | 0.184 | 0.580 | 9 | 33 | 0 | 9.9% | 89.3 | View card › | ||
| 72 | 38 | 0.222 | 0.489 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.1% | 81.2 | View card › |
Legends Deck rates every second baseman using real 2026 Statcast data. For hitters, the key inputs are exit velocity, barrel rate, xwOBA, sprint speed, whiff rate, and chase rate. No scout opinions, no card-by-card tuning: the same fixed pipeline for every player.
Full methodology: How Legends Deck card ratings work. Or read the ranked breakdown: Best Second Basemen in MLB 2026.